What Article 94 prohibits
Article 94 of the Georgian Code of Administrative Offences concerns a breach of the rules protecting electricity networks with a voltage above 1000 volts. The article does not list those rules — it points to the rules which, in its own wording, were established by the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Georgia. That is a practical detail, not a formality: a charge cannot stand up unless it identifies which requirement of which rule was breached.
Pay separate attention to the threshold itself. The article deals specifically with networks above 1000 volts, and that is part of the offence, not a descriptive detail. If the network the work was carried out near does not exceed that voltage, Article 94 is no longer an apt basis and the qualification becomes contestable. Clarify the object's technical characteristic early and compare it with the record.
Cases of this kind commonly arise out of work in a protective strip, earthworks or construction near lines, the movement of machinery, or a structure or planting placed where that is restricted. Liability can fall on a citizen and on an official alike — the article names both categories and attaches a different sanction to each.
The three elements of the offence
The wording of the article ties liability to three elements existing at the same time. Each is verified separately and each can be contested separately:
- an established rule protecting networks above 1000 volts applies to your situation;
- that rule was breached — and the record states which particular requirement;
- the breach resulted, or could have resulted, in one of the listed consequences: an interruption in the supply of electricity to consumers, damage to the electricity networks, or other damage to the national economy.
Without the third element the offence is not made out. If the record describes only the fact of a breach and says nothing about a consequence — neither one that occurred nor one that could have — that is a weak point in the qualification.

