What Article 180¹ covers
Article 180¹ of the Georgian Code of Administrative Offences gathers several distinct situations into a single provision. What they have in common is the subject matter: a civilian firearm that has either been lost, or that cannot be produced when a police officer asks for it. The article is not aimed at the general public. It addresses a person who holds the relevant permit — parts 1 and 4 say so expressly.
Liability here attaches to the duties that come with the right to hold a weapon, rather than to unlawful possession as such.
Four different acts under one penalty
Part 1 lists four acts in the alternative, any one of which is enough on its own:
- breaching the rules on keeping, carrying, transporting or dispatching a civilian firearm, where that breach resulted in the loss of the weapon;
- failing to notify the police that a civilian firearm has been lost;
- refusing to produce the firearm when a police officer demands it;
- being unable to produce the firearm when a police officer demands it.
All four attract the same penalty under part 1 — a fine of 2,000 GEL. One difference between them is nevertheless worth holding on to. The first limb requires a causal link: the breach of the rules must have resulted in the loss. The other three stand independently, and establishing them does not depend on proving any breach of the storage or carriage rules at all.
How the sanction escalates
Article 180¹ deals with repetition separately, and the sanction grows heavier at each step:
- any act described in part 1 — a fine of 2,000 GEL;
- commission of any act under part 1 by a person already penalised under part 1 — a fine of 4,000 GEL;
- commission of any act under part 1 by a person already penalised under part 2 or under part 3 itself — restriction of weapon-related rights for a period of 4 years.
Each step up the ladder rests on the penalty before it, so what decides the step is whether that earlier penalty exists, which part it was imposed under, and against whom.
Two standalone rules
Alongside that chain, the article sets out two situations that do not depend on repetition at all:
- where a permit holder loses two or more weapons at the same time, the article provides directly for restriction of weapon-related rights for a period of 4 years;
- failure to perform an obligation established by the Law of Georgia "On Weapons" entails confiscation of the weapon registered in that person's name.
Article 180¹ does not itself explain what that obligation consists of — it only refers to it. So where a decision rests on that part, the first thing to pin down is which specific obligation is said to have gone unperformed.

