Communications, Media & Digital Space

Manufacturing and using a radio transmitter without a permit (Art. 142)

How much is the fine under Article 142?

The article does not put a lari figure on it. It provides for a fine of between 10 and 30 minimum amounts of labour remuneration, together with confiscation of the radio transmitting device. Where the penalty lands inside that range is decided by the body that hears the case.

If I pay the fine, do I get the equipment back?

The article sets confiscation out as a consequence attaching to the fine, so paying the money does not by itself return the device. These are two separate outcomes, and if you are contesting the confiscation it has to be addressed on its own terms rather than treated as an afterthought to the fine.

The transmitter is not mine — it belongs to my employer. Does that matter?

It may matter a great deal, and it should be raised early with documents rather than asserted in passing. The article does not tell you what happens where the operator and the owner are different people, so the ownership position has to be evidenced: invoices, an equipment register, a contract, whatever actually establishes title.

I only operated the device, I did not build it. Is that a defence?

The article names both manufacture and use, so use on its own is within its scope. What still matters is which act the report attributes to you and whether it does so accurately, because a report that describes conduct you did not carry out is a point worth taking. Read the wording of the allegation carefully before responding to it.

How long do I have to appeal?

Article 142 contains no time limit — it sets out the conduct and the penalty only. The route and the period for challenging a decision come from other provisions of the Code, so they have to be confirmed from the document served on you and from the applicable procedural rules. Do that immediately rather than at leisure.

5 min·22 Aug 2026

What Article 142 actually covers

Article 142 of the Administrative Offences Code of Georgia deals with the manufacture and use of radio transmitting devices without a permit. The provision is short, which is precisely why it repays careful reading: the offence is built on two acts — making the device and using it — carried out where the permit the activity requires does not exist. If a report has been drawn up against you under this article, the argument will usually turn on whether the specific device had a lawful basis, and on how your own conduct relates to that basis.

In practice the article reaches very different people. A radio amateur who assembled a transmitter at home, a small business that installed a repeater at its premises, a technician who merely operated somebody else's equipment — all three can find the same article cited against them, although the facts are not alike. That is why the factual description matters more here than the legal label: it decides whether the question of liability arises against you at all.

The sanction the law provides

Article 142 provides for a fine of between 10 and 30 minimum amounts of labour remuneration, together with confiscation of the radio transmitting device. Both limbs matter, and they have to be read together rather than separately.

  • the fine is not expressed in lari in the article at all — it is set as a multiple of the minimum amount of labour remuneration, from 10 to 30;
  • it is a range and not a fixed figure, so there is room between the lower and the upper limit;
  • the fine is accompanied by confiscation of the device, which the article sets out as a consequence attaching to the penalty.

The article names no sum in lari. If someone quotes you a precise figure, that figure does not come from Article 142 — it follows from the conversion rule that sits outside this provision. On this page we state what the article itself states, and nothing beyond it.

Updated: 7 Nov 2026