Land, Boundaries & Geodesy

Removing and moving the fertile soil layer without a permit (Art. 51²)

Is the fine fixed, or does it depend on how much soil was moved?

Article 51² sets one fixed amount: 1,750 lari. There is no lower or upper limit in the provision, and the figure does not rise with the area or the volume of the layer removed. That is why the argument in these cases is normally about the classification of the act rather than about the size of the penalty.

I had a permit and was still issued a protocol. What now?

The article penalises only removal and displacement that is not connected with measures permitted in the established manner. If the work was carried out under a permit or an approved design, that document is your main argument. Compare the scope of the permit with the work as described in the protocol, and put that comparison in writing.

A contractor did the work. Who is liable?

The article does not define the circle of liable persons, so the answer depends on the facts: who removed and moved the layer, and on whose instruction. This is exactly why the contract, the acceptance certificates and the correspondence matter — they separate the roles from one another.

Does the article require me to restore the soil as well as pay?

Article 51² provides for a fine of 1,750 lari and states nothing further about restoration. Any obligation of that kind would have to come from another legal basis and from the documents in your case, not from this article. Ask your lawyer to identify precisely which act each requirement made of you is founded on.

How long do I have to appeal the decision?

Article 51² does not set an appeal period — it describes only the act and the sanction. The deadline and the addressee of the complaint have to be established from the general part of the Code and from the text of the decision you were given. For that reason it is worth consulting a lawyer as soon as the document arrives, before the period runs out.

5 min·22 Aug 2026

What counts as unauthorised removal of the fertile soil layer

The fertile layer is the upper, humus-rich horizon of the soil — the part that supports vegetation and that takes decades to rebuild naturally. That is why the Administrative Offences Code of Georgia deals with its removal and displacement in a separate provision. Article 51² does not prohibit earthworks as such. It penalises removing and moving the fertile soil layer where that work is not connected with measures permitted in the established manner. The decisive question is therefore a single one: did the work you carried out fall within the scope of a permitted measure?

In practice the article is most often applied to levelling a plot, excavating foundations, laying a road or utility line, extracting soil, hauling it elsewhere and stockpiling it. Liability can attach either to the holder of the land, on whose instruction the work was carried out, or to the person who physically performed it — the owner of the machinery, or a contractor. So if a protocol has been drawn up against you, the first thing to check is who exactly is named in it as the offender, and what factual role is being attributed to you. A case that looks hopeless on the face of the sanction often turns on that single line of the document.

What Article 51² actually provides

The provision combines two elements — removal of the fertile soil layer and its displacement — and ties them to one condition: the act must not be connected with measures permitted in the established manner. The sanction is single and fixed: a fine of 1,750 lari.

  • The article sets no lower and upper limit — the amount is the same in every case;
  • It does not lay down a separate, higher amount for a repeated act;
  • The figure does not scale with the area or the volume of the layer removed.

That apparently technical detail matters a great deal in practice. Because the amount is fixed, an argument about proportionality has nowhere to go, and the dispute normally moves instead to the classification of the act itself: was it in fact the fertile layer that was removed, was it displaced, and above all was there a permit or other document that turns the work into a measure permitted in the established manner? The consolidated text of the article records an amendment made by Law No. 2196 of 20 April 2018.

Updated: 7 Nov 2026