Political Defamation

Is criticizing a politician defamation in Georgia?

No, opinions and harsh criticism are protected speech. Defamation applies only to false factual statements made with malice.

What is the "Actual Malice" standard?

It means the public figure must prove the defendant knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.

Can I sue for a Facebook post?

Yes, social media posts are considered public dissemination. However, identifying the real owner of anonymous accounts can be legally challenging.

Is defamation a criminal offense?

No, defamation was decriminalized in Georgia in 2004. You can only sue for civil damages and retraction, not jail time.

Reading Time

4 min

Published

...

Political defamation represents one of the most complex and specific categories of legal disputes, involving the dissemination of false, reputation-damaging facts about political figures, parties, or public officials in the public sphere. In Georgia, where political processes are dynamic and often polarized, defamation frequently becomes a tool of political warfare. However, legislation draws a clear line between freedom of expression and the protection of an individual's reputation. In a political context, a defamation dispute differs from a standard civil dispute in that public figures have a much higher obligation of tolerance (threshold) than private individuals. This means a politician must endure more criticism and harsh statements. Nevertheless, this does not mean that spreading deliberate lies against them is permissible. This service implies qualified legal assistance for individuals who have become victims of politically motivated defamation, or conversely, those who are groundlessly accused of defamation during political debates.

What does this service cover?

The political defamation service covers a wide range of legal actions:

  • Linguistic and Legal Analysis: Determining whether the disseminated information constitutes a fact (which can be defamation) or an opinion/evaluation (which is protected by freedom of speech).
  • Evidence Preservation: Legally securing TV broadcasts, social media posts, press briefings, and articles (including fact certification via the Enforcement Bureau).
  • Proving "Actual Malice": In the case of a political figure, it is necessary to prove that the disseminator knew the information was false or acted with gross negligence.
  • Preparation of Rebuttal: Sending an official request to media outlets demanding the publication of a retraction or correction.
  • Court Representation: Drafting a lawsuit demanding compensation for moral damage and retraction of statements in courts of all instances.

Common Real-World Scenarios

Political defamation disputes often arise in the following scenarios:

  • Election Campaigns: An opposing candidate spreads information that the other candidate has a criminal record for a serious crime, which is false and aims to mislead voters.
  • Corruption Allegations: Media reports claim a specific politician embezzled budget funds, yet no documentary evidence or investigation exists.
  • Social Media Disinformation: A coordinated campaign by "bots" and "trolls" spreading edited video or audio material to discredit a politician.
  • Parliamentary Statements: A statement made by an MP from the tribune that contains defamation. Here, issues of parliamentary immunity and indemnity must be considered.

Georgian Legal Framework

The regulation of political defamation is based on the Constitution of Georgia (freedom of speech) and the Law on Freedom of Speech and Expression. This law sets one of the highest standards in the world for protecting freedom of speech. According to the law, liability for defamation of a public figure arises only if the plaintiff proves that the defendant acted with "actual malice" (knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth). Also important is the Civil Code of Georgia (Article 18), which defines general rules for protecting honor and dignity. The burden of proof in political disputes always lies with the plaintiff (the victim).

Process: How does a specialist work?

Working with a lawyer begins with strategic planning. Since litigation can be politically disadvantageous for a politician, the lawyer assesses the risks. The first step is identifying the source of the information and collecting evidence. Then, a formal claim demanding retraction is sent. If the defendant does not satisfy the demand, a lawsuit is prepared. In court, the lawyer's main task is to prove that the disseminated information was a fact (not an opinion), that it was false, and that the dissemination was intentional, aiming to cause harm.

Why Legal.ge?

Political defamation cases require not only legal knowledge but also a deep understanding of media law and political context. On Legal.ge, you will find specialists with experience working on high-profile cases. Our platform's lawyers will help you protect your political reputation and dignity, use legal leverage against disinformation, and receive appropriate compensation. Trust professionals who know where the line between criticism and defamation lies.

Updated: ...

Specialists for this service

Loading...