Personal Injury

Silicosis Litigation

Is there a separate silicosis statute?

No. Georgia has neither a special silicosis statute nor a class-action mechanism; the route is an ordinary tort claim — Articles 992, 997 and 998.

What is joint and several liability?

Under Article 998, where several persons participate in causing the damage they answer as joint debtors; liable is not only the direct causer but also the instigator, the aider and the one who consciously profited from the damage.

Who answers for service-related damage?

Under Article 997 the employer answers for his employee's unlawful act in the performance of service duties; where the employee acted without fault, no liability arises.

Can moral damage be claimed?

Yes — under Article 413, where bodily injury or harm to health occurred, the victim may claim compensation for non-pecuniary damage.

When does the limitation period start?

Under Article 1008 — from the moment the victim learned of the damage or of the liable person; the period is three years.

5 min·9 Jan 2026

Silicosis Litigation — the Framework of Georgian Law

Silicosis is an occupational disease connected with the processing of stone, sand and concrete: construction, stone production and ongoing works are its typical environment. It must be said plainly at the outset: Georgian law has neither a special statute for silicosis nor a class-action mechanism — the route is an ordinary tort claim, which covers multi-party participation through joint and several liability. The grounds are: Article 992 — a person who causes damage to another by an unlawful, intentional or negligent act is obliged to compensate it; Article 997 — the employer answers for his employee's unlawful act committed in the performance of service duties; and Article 998 — joint and several liability where several persons participate in causing the damage.

Proving the Exposure — Articles 992 and 997

A silicosis case begins with proving the exposure: where, when and under what conditions the influence of quartz dust occurred. There are two legal constructions: general fault (Article 992) — where the negligent act of the person causing the damage is established directly; and the service-connection construction (Article 997) — where the damage was caused by the employer's employee's unlawful act in the performance of service duties; in the latter case no liability arises if the employee acted without fault. In construction practice both constructions are realistic — and choosing between them correctly predetermines the outcome of the case.

Because of the multi-year exposure, in a silicosis case the work history is itself evidence: where the victim worked, in which technological operations he was involved, what protective equipment he had and what the industrial environment was like. Together with the specifics of processing stone, concrete and sand composition, these facts create the pillar of causation on which the entire claim stands. Therefore, the documentary reconstruction of this history is the first task immediately upon starting the case.

Joint and Several Liability — Article 998

The peculiarity of silicosis cases is multi-party participation: on a site several relationships usually operate — the client, the contractor, the subcontractors. Article 998 regulates this situation: where several persons participate in causing the damage, they answer as joint debtors. Liability for the damage is borne not only by the person who directly caused it, but also by the one who instigated or aided it, as well as the one who consciously took advantage of the damage caused to another. For the victim this is a powerful instrument: the claim may be presented in full to any participant, and the equalisation among the parties becomes their own internal matter.