Challenging decisions related to environmental permits
If your activity touches the field of environmental protection and you have been refused a permit, or a permit you held has been cancelled, the question is what avenues you have. In Georgian law the frame for such disputes is created by the Law of Georgia on Licenses and Permits, while the general rules of administrative procedure come from the General Administrative Code. The environmental specificity is that activities covered by a permit are often connected with natural resources, public health and the interests of society at large, so the choice of appeal route matters especially. This page explains which decisions can be appealed, what grounds exist for refusal, and what filing an appeal does to the operation of the decision.
It is important to define terminology at the outset. A permit is an individual administrative-legal act of a body that regulates the performance of a specific action. Decisions connected with a permit — issuance, refusal to issue, cancellation — are all appealable administrative acts, and that is why the general mechanisms of administrative appeal and judicial control apply to them.
Routes for appealing a refusal
The law directly provides that the decision of the licence issuer to refuse to issue an activity licence may be appealed to a superior administrative body (an official) or to a court. This means two routes: the administrative one, before a superior body, and the judicial one, before a judge. Both are lawful and the choice is yours — the law does not make administrative appeal a precondition for a lawsuit.
Grounds for refusing to issue a permit
The permit issuer will not issue a permit in three situations. First: the application and attached documents submitted by the permit seeker do not satisfy the requirements of the law and were not corrected by the permit seeker within the period established by the administrative body. Second: the permit seeker cannot satisfy the permit conditions established by law, or by a normative act of the Government of Georgia adopted on the basis of law, or by the representative body of a municipality. Third: the permit seeker has been deprived, by a court judgment that has entered into legal force finding them guilty, of the right to carry on activities in the corresponding permit field.
In the context of environmental permits, knowing these grounds is important in two directions: they show you what to work on before re-applying — the completeness of documentation and formal requirements, the real feasibility of the permit conditions, or your legal history.
A decision refusing a permit is appealed under the same norm, and your dispute strategy must be built on it: the appeal or statement of claim should state that none of the grounds for refusal existed, or that the procedure was violated.
With environmental permits one further circumstance matters: activity covered by a permit often requires other consents as well, and the motives of a refusal are sometimes hidden in that chain. Before appealing, re-analyse the procedural history: what notifications came from the body, what periods were set for correction, and what documentation was requested. This substantiates the appeal and gives the superior body or the court an easily grasped picture.