In the gambling business the aggregator is the gateway through which hundreds of games from dozens of studios enter an operator's site at once — and that is exactly why it is one of the hardest objects of contract design: one chain simultaneously contains the game's creator, the aggregator, the operator and the regulator, each with its own interest. This page is written through the prism of contract practice: what the B2B licensing reality looks like from verified sources, which clauses decide the allocation of risk in an aggregation agreement, and how the Georgian legal layer works over this chain. We do not quote particular aggregators' terms or tariffs here — those are a matter for negotiation.
The B2B licensing reality: who answers for what
The first thing to see: in serious jurisdictions the supply of games is a separate object of licensing, and this reads from the official taxonomies. In Malta the B2B direction — the critical gaming supply — has its own application routes: Game Providers and Back Office, or Back Office only, which covers the systems generating and processing regulatory records. The Kahnawake regulations distinguish a Casino Software Provider Authorization, appended to the single IGL and valid only while it remains in good standing. Gibraltar's new regime defines B2B as supplies made in or from Gibraltar or to a Gibraltar entity, and separately establishes content-provider approval for supply through the Gibraltar-licensed aggregator platform. These taxonomies matter to a Georgian client for one reason: they show that every ring of the supply chain is recognisable in the regulator's eyes — and the contracts must follow that recognisability.
Through the Georgian prism this chain has its own clear rule: article 5, part 1 of the gambling law ties both the organising and the supplying of gambling into Georgia to a permit, and article 11, part 2 issues that permit only to an entrepreneur registered in Georgia. Entering the Georgian contour of an aggregation chain therefore means that a Georgian permit-holding entrepreneur must appear in the chain — and contract design builds the bridge between these two worlds.