Public administration in Georgia acts largely through administrative-legal acts: decisions, orders, resolutions, permits and refusals issued by administrative organs that directly affect the rights, obligations and legitimate interests of individuals and organisations. The General Administrative Code of Georgia establishes a dedicated mechanism for challenging such measures administratively — before the administration itself — so that a violated right can be restored without immediately resorting to litigation. This page describes that mechanism in full: what exactly can be challenged, which organ is competent to examine the complaint, the statutory appeal deadline and the rules for its restoration, the mandatory content of a written complaint, the examination timeline, the suspension of the challenged act during the examination, and the way the proceedings conclude.
What Can Be Challenged
Under the Code, an interested party has the right to challenge an administrative-legal act issued by an administrative organ. The protection is not confined to formally issued acts. If the administrative organ violates the time limit established for the issuance of an act, that violation is deemed to be a refusal to issue the act, and this deemed refusal is challengeable under the same procedure. Furthermore, an action of an administrative organ that is not connected with the issuance of an administrative-legal act is likewise challengeable under the same procedure, which extends the remedy to the organ's actual conduct beyond the sphere of formal paperwork.
There is, however, a boundary drawn around procedural measures: a decision of an administrative organ taken in connection with a matter of administrative proceedings is not subject to separate challenge, except where this is directly provided for by law or where the decision, independently of the corresponding administrative-legal act, infringes a person's right or legitimate interest. In other words, dissatisfaction with an internal procedural step becomes the proper subject of a complaint only when the law expressly allows it or when the step itself causes independent harm.

