LegalGELegalGE
ServicesSpecialistsCompaniesTrainingsNewsContact
...
Loading...
LEGAL.GELEGAL.GE

Legal Services Platform

Quick Links

  • Services
  • Specialists
  • Companies
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookie Policy

Contact

contact@legal.ge

+995 551 911 961

Tbilisi, Georgia

© 2026 LEGAL.GE — All rights reserved.

Made with in Georgia

  1. Home
  2. Services
  3. Criminal Law
  4. Specialized Advocacy, Extradition & Victim Services
  5. Complicity & Accessory Defense
  6. Accomplice Defense

Loading...

AccompliceDefense

What if I didn''t know a crime was happening?

If you lacked intent and knowledge, you are not an accomplice. Proving lack of "mens rea" is a key defense strategy.

Is the driver always considered an accomplice?

Not always. If the driver was unaware of the criminal intent of the passengers (e.g., a taxi driver), they should not be liable.

Do accomplices get the same sentence as the main criminal?

They are charged under the same article, but the judge can impose a lighter sentence based on the lesser degree of participation.

What is "Excess of the Perpetrator"?

It means the main actor committed a crime not agreed upon by the accomplices. Accomplices are not liable for this specific excess act.

Reading Time

4 min

Published

...

Accomplice Defense (Co-participation) in Criminal Cases

In criminal cases, often not just one, but several individuals are involved. Complicity in a crime (Article 23 of the Criminal Code of Georgia) implies the intentional joint participation of two or more persons in the commission of an intentional crime. The prosecution often attempts to assign the most severe qualification to everyone associated with the crime, regardless of their actual role. An accomplice can be a person who directly committed the crime (co-perpetrator) or someone who facilitated it (organizer, instigator, aider). Distinguishing each person''s role is critically important for the defense strategy. It is common for individuals to be present at a crime scene accidentally or without realizing the criminal nature of the act, yet the prosecution views them as accomplices. The task of a qualified lawyer is to prove that there was no "common intent" in the client''s actions, which is a necessary element of complicity.

What Does This Service Cover?

Lawyers registered on Legal.ge offer full legal support for accomplice charges:

  • Role Separation: Building a defense strategy based on the specific actions performed by the client. The goal is to prove that their role was secondary or even non-criminal.
  • Refuting Intent (Mens Rea): Proving that the client did not know about the main perpetrator''s actual plans (e.g., a driver who drove a friend to a location not knowing they planned a robbery).
  • Reclassifying Group Crimes: Crimes committed by a group carry harsher penalties. The lawyer works to reclassify the act as individual rather than group-based.
  • Using "Excess of Perpetrator": Defending on the grounds that the main perpetrator went beyond the agreement (e.g., agreeing to theft, but the perpetrator committed murder), for which the accomplice is not liable.
  • Plea Bargaining: Negotiating significant sentence reductions or probation in exchange for cooperation with the investigation.

Common Scenarios and Real-World Situations

Accomplice charges can be brought in various situations:

The first scenario is the "Driver Case." A person uses their taxi or car to drive acquaintances who commit a crime (e.g., theft). The driver waits in the car. If they had no prior knowledge of the crime, they are not an accomplice, though prosecutions often argue otherwise.

The second scenario is the "Accidental Bystander." During a fight, one participant pulls a knife and kills another. Other participants, who only used fists, are charged with group murder. Proving the "excess of the perpetrator" is crucial here.

The third case is "Hiding Items." A person stores an item brought by a friend, which turns out to be stolen. If they knew the origin, it''s a crime (receiving stolen goods), but not necessarily complicity in the theft.

The fourth scenario is "Corporate Complicity." In financial fraud cases within a company, an accountant or manager following a director''s orders may be charged as an accomplice.

Georgian Legal Framework

The defense is based on fundamental principles of the Criminal Code:

  • Criminal Code of Georgia (Article 23): Concept of complicity. Defines it as intentional joint participation.
  • Article 24: Types of accomplices (Organizer, Instigator, Helper/Aider).
  • Article 25: Liability of accomplices. Determines that an accomplice is liable under the same article as the perpetrator, but their role is considered during sentencing.
  • Article 26: Excess of the perpetrator. A vital article for defense, exempting an accomplice from liability for acts that were not agreed upon.

Service Process Step-by-Step

  1. Analysis of Testimonies: The lawyer carefully studies the testimonies of other defendants, as accomplices often blame each other.
  2. Confrontation: Cross-examination with other defendants to establish the truth.
  3. Individualization of Role: Proving in court that the client''s role was minimal.
  4. Verdict: Fighting for reclassification or minimization of the sentence.

Why Use Legal.ge?

Accomplice cases are complex puzzles where one person''s testimony can decide another''s fate. On Legal.ge, you will find lawyers experienced in group crimes who know how to separate a client from the main perpetrator. Do not answer for someone else''s actions—find your defender today.

Updated: ...