About this service
Defence in illegal search and seizure cases in Georgia rests on the norms of the Criminal Code that protect the inviolability of the home and other property together with the secrecy of private life. One circumstance is decisive from the outset: the current Code contains no standalone article dedicated to „search and seizure“. Unlawful entry into a home or other property against the possessor's will and an unlawful search qualify as violation of the inviolability of the home or other property, and in practice this charge is frequently combined with adjacent offences — infringement of private-life information or personal data, violation of the secrecy of private communication, and violation of the secrecy of correspondence, telephone conversations and other messages.
Violation of the inviolability of home and other property
Under the relevant norm of the Code, unlawful entry into a home or other property against the possessor's will, an unlawful search, or any other act violating the inviolability of a home or other property is punished by a fine, or corrective labour for up to two years, or home arrest for a term of six months to one year, or imprisonment for up to two years. The norm does not reach lawful procedural acts: a search carried out under the procedure established by other legislation is not a crime. This is precisely where practical disputes begin — the defence examines whether the act was genuinely unlawful and genuinely against the possessor's will, because negating either element weakens the qualification as a whole.
The same act committed with violence or the threat of violence, or one that caused significant damage, is punished by a fine, or home arrest for a term of one to two years, or imprisonment for a term of one to three years, with restriction of weapon-related rights or without it. The gravest composition applies where the act was committed by a group, through the use of official position or a weapon, or repeatedly — in that case the sanction is a fine or imprisonment for a term of two to five years, with deprivation of the right to hold office or carry out activity for up to three years, with restriction of weapon-related rights or without it.
Adjacent norms — data and communications
Where a search is accompanied by the obtaining or dissemination of information, the charge often moves to infringement of private-life information or personal data. Under the first part of that norm, unlawful obtaining, storage, use, dissemination or other making available of such information or data that caused significant damage is punished by a fine, or corrective labour for up to two years, or imprisonment for up to three years. Where dissemination occurs through the internet, including social networks, mass broadcasting or another public statement, the upper limit rises to four years; a mercenary or repeated commission is punished by a fine or imprisonment for up to five years; and where the act was committed by a person obliged to protect that information or through the use of official position, the sentence is imprisonment for a term of four to seven years, with deprivation of the right to hold office or carry out activity for up to three years or without it.
Violation of the secrecy of private communication covers the unauthorised recording or eavesdropping of a private conversation, as well as the unauthorised obtaining, by technical means, of computer data transmitted in a computer system or electromagnetic waves carrying such data during private communication, and the unlawful storage of such information — punishable by a fine or imprisonment for a term of two to four years. The unlawful use, dissemination or other making available of the recording or data is punished by two to five years; a mercenary or repeated commission by three to six years; and where significant damage was caused or official position was used, by three to seven years with deprivation of the right to hold office or carry out activity for up to three years. The secrecy of correspondence, telephone conversations and other messages has the same structure: unlawful obtaining, opening, familiarisation with the content or storage of a letter, postal item or message is punished by a fine, or corrective labour for up to two years, or imprisonment for up to three years; use and dissemination by two to five years; mercenary or repeated commission by three to six years; significant damage or official position by three to seven years.
Defence arguments and exemptions
The first argument is the lawfulness of the act: the procedure for search and seizure is established by other legislation, and if the prosecution cannot prove compliance, the elements of the offence fall away. The second is the possessor's will: entry and handing-over performed with consent is not punishable under this norm. The third is the result: significant damage moves the case into a qualified composition, so the extent of the damage and its causal link require independent expert assessment. The law also contains a special exculpatory rule: a person who handed the obtained or stored information to investigative bodies and thereby supplied information about a committed or expected other criminal act bears no criminal liability for obtaining or storing it under the first part of the relevant article. A legal person, in turn, is punished for these offences by a fine, deprivation of the right to carry out activity, or liquidation together with a fine.
How we help on Legal.ge
Our team handles the full defence cycle in illegal search and seizure cases: we analyse the lawfulness of the procedure and its grounds, assess the evidence of the possessor's will and of the damage, prepare motions and complaints, and represent you in every instance. If you or a relative faces such a charge, contact us — at the first consultation we define a concrete strategy based on the facts of your case. Legal.ge — reliable legal support across Georgia.