What the Article on Damage to Property Covers
Article 187 of the Criminal Code of Georgia covers the damaging or destruction of another person’s item when this caused significant damage. This is a property crime that in practice often surfaces against the backdrop of quarrels, family conflicts, vandalism or household disputes. The mandatory element of the article is the consequence — significant damage: if the damage is not significant, the case does not proceed under this criminal norm. The criterion of “significant damage” is not defined numerically in the article itself — it is established by other provisions of the Code, and its assessment in a case rests on a broad body of evidence.
For the accused, the danger of this article lies in the steepness of the ladder: the penalty starts with a fine and rises sharply with the circumstances — the means of commission, repetition and the gravity of the consequence — up to nine to twelve years of imprisonment. That is why the defense in these cases always begins with three questions: what exactly was damaged, to what extent, and who committed the act and how.
The Basic Composition and Its Penalties
Under the first part of the article, damaging or destroying another person’s item that caused significant damage is punished by:
- a fine;
- community service for a term of one hundred to one hundred eighty hours;
- corrective labor for a term of up to one year;
- house arrest for a term of six months to two years;
- or imprisonment for a term of one to five years.
The law provides wide alternatives here, which gives the defense a chance to bring the case to an end with a fine — on condition that the damage is assessed precisely and the circumstances of the commission are correctly recorded at the very beginning of the case.
Aggravating Signs: Three to Six Years
Under the second part, the same act is punished far more severely when committed:
- by arson, explosion or another universally dangerous means;
- more than once;
- by a group.
Such an act is punished by imprisonment for a term of three to six years, with or without restriction of rights related to weapons. The most contested questions here are: what was actually used as a “universally dangerous means”, whether the acts fell within a single intent (the sign of repetition), and how the roles were divided within the group.
Compositions Aggravated by Consequence
The law is especially strict where damage costs a life. An act under the second part that negligently caused the death of a person or another grave consequence is punished by imprisonment for a term of six to ten years, with or without restriction of rights related to weapons. And where negligence caused the death of two or more persons, the penalty reaches imprisonment for a term of nine to twelve years, with or without restriction of rights related to weapons.
The word “negligently” matters: the consequence must not have been intended — the prosecution asserts that the accused could have foreseen it and failed to exercise due care. It is precisely on this link — between the consequence and the accused’s conduct — that the defense builds its position, and complex examinations are decisive here: fire-technical, medical and others.
How the Defense Approaches Property Damage Cases
The defense’s first task is the assessment of the damage: the threshold of “significant damage” is set by other provisions, and the figure proposed by the prosecution must always be re-verified by an independent assessment. The second task is the subjective side: the intent to damage must be proven; the widespread situations where the item is in joint ownership or in dispute between family members often change the qualification. The third is the manner of commission: the sign of arson or explosion must be established clearly by expert examination, while the group element requires separate proof of each participant’s role. The fourth is the causal link to the consequence: if the death or grave consequence was caused by another factor, the aggravated qualification falls away. The rules of investigation and trial are governed by other provisions of the Code — their violation is an instrument of the defense.
A separate direction is the qualification of everyday disputes. In practice it is common for the damaged item to be in the joint ownership of family members, or for the parties to claim the same property: in such situations the concept of “another person’s item” and the boundary of intent change objectively, and the prosecution often overestimates this nuance. The concept of a universally dangerous means is also bounded: a simple blow or knocking an item down does not automatically fall under this sign — the case requires technical establishment of fire, explosion or analogous dangerous impact, and this is always the subject of an expert conclusion. The defense’s task is to expose these boundaries at the very first stage of the case, before the prosecution shapes its final version.
How Legal.ge Can Help
On the Legal.ge platform you can select a criminal defense lawyer working on property crimes. The lawyer will re-verify the assessment of the damage, request independent expert examinations, assess the correctness of the qualification and protect your interests at every stage of the investigation and the trial. Fill in a request on the site — a lawyer will contact you and assess your case.