Legal.geLegal.ge
SpecialistsLibraryPricing
More
AboutBlogContact
LegalTools
...
Loading account
AboutSpecialistsLibraryPricingBlogContact
LegalTools
Loading account
Legal.ge

Georgia’s legal marketplace.

Download on the App StoreLegal.ge for iPhone

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Specialists
  • Open tasks
  • Services
  • Laws & Codes
  • Firms
  • Organisations
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Legal library
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookie Policy

Contact

contact@legal.geNeed a lawyer? Find a specialist

Tbilisi, Georgia

Specialist Directory

Criminal Law AttorneyCriminal Law LawyerCivil Law AttorneyCivil Law LawyerCorporate & Commercial Law AttorneyCorporate & Commercial Law LawyerLabor & Employment Law AttorneyLabor & Employment Law LawyerTax Law AttorneyTax Law LawyerDispute Resolution & Litigation AttorneyDispute Resolution & Litigation Lawyer

© 2026 Legal.ge. All rights reserved.

Made with in Georgia

  1. Services
  2. Criminal Law
  3. Specialized Advocacy, Extradition & Victim Services
  4. Attempt, Conspiracy & Solicitation
  5. Solicitation of Crime Defense

Services

0 services available

Loading...

Attempt, Conspiracy & Solicitation

Solicitation of Crime Defense

Who is an instigator?

One who deliberately persuaded another person to commit a crime — forming the decision in them.

What is provocation?

Persuasion to commit a crime for the purpose of bringing the person to criminal liability; it is a separate crime.

How is each person's guilt assessed?

Only for their own guilt, considering the nature and degree of participation in the crime.

What if the crime was not completed?

The instigator is liable for participation in preparation or attempt.

4 min·8 Feb 2026

The Nature of an Instigation Charge

A charge of instigation is connected with the complicity norms of the Criminal Code of Georgia, and its defense begins by clarifying the conceptual boundaries the law establishes. Under the twenty-fourth article of the Code, an instigator is one who has deliberately persuaded another person to commit a crime. This definition raises two questions that are the pillars of the defense: what counts as "persuasion" and how deliberate it was. Comparison with the other forms of complicity also matters: an organizer arranges or directs the crime, an aider facilitates its commission, while the instigator's function is the formation of the decision to commit it in another person.

The Rule of Liability and the Levers of Defense

The twenty-fifth article provides that the perpetrator and the accomplice bear criminal liability only for their own guilt, on the basis of a single unlawful act, considering the nature and degree of each person's participation in the commission of the crime. The instigator's liability is determined by the relevant article with a reference to it — except where the instigator was simultaneously a co-perpetrator. For the defense this means that the prosecution must precisely establish and evidence the role of each participant.

The article contains two further pillars. First: where a feature characterizing the unlawful act exists on the side of the perpetrator or an accomplice, it is imputed to another only if that person was aware of it; a personal feature is imputed only to the person it characterizes. Second: if the perpetrator did not complete the crime, the instigator's liability is assessed as participation in preparation or attempt — and liability for preparation also falls on one who, due to circumstances independent of them, failed to persuade another person to commit the crime.

Provocation of a Crime

The central lever of defense is the one hundred and forty-fifth article of the Code — provocation of a crime. By the law's definition, provocation is persuading another to commit a crime for the purpose of bringing that person to criminal liability. Such conduct is a separate crime and is punished by house arrest from six months to two years or imprisonment from one to three years.

The practical significance of the provocation norm appears especially where the commission is induced by a state representative or a person connected with one: if the persuasion was carried out not to detect a crime but to bring the involved person to liability, the inducer's conduct falls precisely under this article. The defense position here is two-sided: on the one hand, an accused who was provoked may show that the idea of committing the crime would not have arisen in them without external inducement; on the other, for an accused charged as an instigator, the purpose — bringing to liability or a real cause of the crime — is a foundational question of evidence.

The Distinguishing Line Between Instigator and Perpetrator

Participation in crimes composed of a special subject is separately regulated: a person who cannot be a perpetrator bears liability in the capacity of organizer, instigator or aider. Temporal and substantive analysis also matters for the defense: persuasion must precede the formation of the decision; supplying information, advice or mere discussion of an idea is not persuasion in itself. Where the decision was already formed and the person merely assessed an existing plan, the qualification of instigator becomes doubtful — this distinguishing line is a constant question of judicial practice, and it is precisely here that the defense looks for a ground to change the qualification — the real source of the idea of committing the crime.

Frequently Asked Questions

What distinguishes an instigator from an aider?

The instigator persuades another person to commit a crime — forming the decision in them; the aider facilitates a commission already intended or underway. Establishing the source of the decision is the basis of the qualification.

What is provocation of a crime and how is it punished?

Persuading another to commit a crime for the purpose of bringing them to criminal liability; punished by house arrest from six months to two years or imprisonment from one to three years.

Who must prove each role?

The prosecution must establish the nature and degree of participation with evidence; liability attaches to each only for their own guilt, and an objective feature is not imputed without awareness.

What if the perpetrator did not complete the crime?

The instigator is liable for participation in preparation or attempt; even one who failed to persuade another is liable for preparation of the uncommitted crime.

How We Help on Legal.ge

An instigation charge often begins with a single word and rests on a whole chain of evidence. On Legal.ge we help verify the qualification of the form of participation, distinguish persuasion from the supply of information, and identify the elements of provocation. Contact us — we will handle your case under the Criminal Code's exact norms.

Updated: 22 Aug 2026

Verified against current law: 9 Jul 2026

Legal basis:

  • საქართველოს სისხლის სამართლის კოდექსი

Find a Specialist

Professionals working in this field

Criminal Law AttorneyCriminal Law Lawyer