უკან ბლოგზე
Legaltech

The Nature and Intersection of Digital and Smart Contracts

Digital contracts and smart contracts intersect across the following dimensions: Taxonomic Classification: A smart contract is categorized as a subset of an electronic contract. It functions similarly to a traditional agreement, though executed in a comprehensively digitized format. Legal Nature: Smart contracts, analogous to other digital contracts, are encompassed within the legal definition of an electronic document. For a smart contract to constitute a legally binding agreement, it must fulfill the fundamental prerequisites of contract formation and validity (e.g., mutual consent of the parties and adequate terms)—requirements that programming code alone cannot substitute. Functional Overlap: Within the processes of concluding and executing a digital contract, a smart contract may be implemented as a technological utility (for example, as an automated payment mechanism for recurring transactions).

4 წუთი
The Nature and Intersection of Digital and Smart Contracts

1. Digital (electronic) contract

An electronic/digital contract is digital content, originating and delivered in electronic form, created in the form of an electronic document, which implies content material stored in electronic form, whether it is text, sound, pictorial (visual) or sound-pictorial (audiovisual) recording, information, or a set of data. It is concluded using electronic means, and the general rules of contract formation are used for its formation.

The main characteristics of an electronic/digital contract are:

  • Form: It is created in the form of an electronic document, which implies electronically stored text, sound, visual/audiovisual recording, information, or a set of data.

  • Means of conclusion: It is concluded using electronic means and is based on the general rules of contract formation.

  • Subject: It can be both an electronic service/product, as well as any other service that involves an obligatory relationship between a trader and a consumer. At the same time, the digital contract itself also represents a digital product and service.

  • Remote character: A remotely concluded contract, where the parties are not physically present simultaneously, is an electronic contract.

Unlike a remote contract, for the existence of a digital contract, the form of concluding the contract is important and not the form of agreeing on the terms. Specifically, according to subparagraph "d" of Article 4 of the Law of Georgia "On the Protection of Consumer Rights", a contract is not considered a remote contract if the consumer and the trader agreed on the terms of the contract at the business premises and the contract was concluded remotely only after this.

2. Smart Contract

A smart contract is a new type of agreement in which the terms of the transaction, presented in digital form, are computer code. A smart contract, a bilateral contract concluded between businesses, between individuals, and between machines, is executed automatically. A smart contract may contain operational and non-operational conditions (clauses). Conditional logic is built into the mentioned clauses, according to which actions are carried out at a specific time and with a specific event, whether it is depositing a specific amount for a payment date in a financial organization at a defined floating interest rate or other financial operations. Non-operational clauses do not have conditional logic, but are connected to the broad legal relationship existing between the parties: which law should be applied, which court should have jurisdiction, etc.

  • Essence: This is self-executing software code in which the terms of the transaction are presented in digital form (in computer code). According to Nick Szabo's definition, this is a "set of promises" that includes protocols to execute these promises.

  • Automation: It is characterized by the automatic execution of obligations upon the occurrence of predefined conditions (conditional logic), without additional actions by the parties.

  • Technological basis: It functions on the basis of distributed ledger technologies (DLT) (e.g., blockchain), which ensures its security and immutability.

  • Structure: It may contain operational clauses (logic built into the code for specific actions) and non-operational clauses (legal framework, e.g., which law is applied).

3. Mutual Intersection

The digital contract and the smart contract intersect in the following aspects:

  1. Categorical relationship: A smart contract is considered a subtype of an electronic contract. It is similar to a traditional agreement, but in a fully digitized form.

  2. Legal nature: A smart contract, just like other digital contracts, fits into the definition of an electronic document. In order for a smart contract to be legally binding, it must satisfy the general requirements for the validity and formation of a contract (the will of the parties, adequate terms), which software code alone cannot replace.

  3. Functional intersection: In the process of concluding and executing a digital contract, a smart contract can be used as a technological tool (for example, a payment tool for regular transfers. It is possible).

Need Professional Help?

If you need qualified specialist consultation or services on this topic, you can:

Find a Specialist
Find the right expert for you
Or contact us:

მსგავსი სტატიები

Can Artificial Intelligence Be an Author?

Can Artificial Intelligence Be an Author?

The involvement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) can transcend the outcomes predetermined by a user; consequently, AI itself could be perceived as an author, given that modern AI possesses the capability to create works without human intervention. This theory is quite provocative, as it directly contradicts the standard definition of authorship, according to which an author is a natural person through whose intellectual-creative activity a work is produced. It is important to note that the primary-and perhaps only-advantage of machine authorship is that it aligns with the core logic of intellectual property rights, which dictates that the creator is the author.

New Concepts of Digital Law: Big Data, BDCE, and FinTech

New Concepts of Digital Law: Big Data, BDCE, and FinTech

The legal regulation of the digital economy requires understanding the technological foundations driving the financial and business sectors. This analysis identifies four essential pillars for legal professionals: Big Data: Substantial volumes of heterogeneous digital data, facts, and unrestricted activities collected at high velocity. It is characterized by real-time processing through advanced analytical algorithms. Big Data Complex Ecosystem (BDCE): An IT infrastructure consisting of integrated systems for data collection, storage, and use. It unites data owners, cloud providers, and academic institutions into a unified infrastructure. Data Architecture: A component of the BDCE that defines how data is processed, stored, and integrated for organizational purposes. It serves as a conceptual model for data governance, lifecycle management, and security. FinTech and Big Personal Data: Financial Technology leverages Big Data, AI, and Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLT) for platform-based service delivery. This process generates "Big Personal Data"—personal information created or processed within these complex ecosystems.

The Intersection of Big Data and Market Competition in Georgia

The Intersection of Big Data and Market Competition in Georgia

In today's fast-moving digital economy, the lines between where we bank and where we shop, work, and live are becoming increasingly blurred. In Georgia, this evolution has reached a critical tipping point as the nation's two largest financial giants—TBC Group and Lion Finance Group PLC (formerly Bank of Georgia Group)—have successfully built sprawling "digital ecosystems" that touch almost every aspect of a citizen's daily life. From buying a car on MyAuto to managing a small business with Optimo, these platforms are no longer just apps; they have become the "gatekeepers" of the Georgian digital marketplace. While this integration offers undeniable convenience, it raises a profound structural question for our market: What happens when the people who hold our money also hold all of our data?